Speaker of the House Mike Johnson, R-La., speaks during the news conference following the House Republican Conference caucus meeting at the Republican National Committee headquarters in Washington on Wednesday, May 13, 2026.
Bill Clark | CQ-Roll Call, Inc. | Getty Images
The U.S. House is poised to vote to on a $70 billion package to fund immigration enforcement agencies and, after months of partisan fighting, send the measure to President Donald Trump’s desk.
The package would fund Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Customs and Border Protection, two Department of Homeland Security subagencies left out of an earlier spending bill amid Democratic opposition, and bring to an end a drawn-out debate over immigration enforcement policy that began in January and led to a government shutdown.
A final House vote to pass the immigration funding package could come as soon as Tuesday.
The Senate passed the package early Friday morning on a 52-47 vote. It would fund the immigration enforcement agencies through the end of Trump’s presidency. Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, was the lone Republican to vote against it.
“We were forced to use the reconciliation process because Democrats objected – during the appropriations process – to giving any money to Border Patrol and ICE, effectively shutting our border security down at a time of growing threats to the nation,” Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., chair of the Senate budget panel, said in a statement on Friday after the measure passed. Graham was referring to the budget reconciliation process, which allows for the passage of legislation in the Senate on a party-line vote.
“In less than two years, President Trump has taken the border from the most broken to the most secure in history. The bill we passed today locks those gains in through the rest of his term,” Graham continued.
Democrats have opposed funding for both ICE and CBP since two civilians were killed by federal law enforcement in Minneapolis during a January immigration enforcement surge. A more than two-month-long partial government shutdown followed, and Republicans were forced to turn to the budget reconciliation process.
Budget reconciliation can be used only for spending-related measures but requires just 50 votes to pass in the Senate, instead of the 60 votes normally required to overcome a filibuster. The measure needs only a simple majority in the House, where the Rules Committee began consideration Monday afternoon.
With a razor-thin majority in the House, Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., will need near unanimous support to advance the measure, which is expected to get little, if any, Democratic support. In a show of their objections to the package, Democrats had introduced more than 150 amendments to the reconciliation bill as of Monday.
“House Democrats will be a hard no on the reckless republican budget reconciliation bill this week,” Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., said at a press conference on Monday.
Trump had initially demanded the package on his desk by June 1, but its fate was uncertain in late May after the president announced without consultation from Congress a $1.8 billion “anti-weaponization” fund to compensate Americans wrongly targeted by the government, including potentially Jan. 6 defendants.
The proposal met bipartisan backlash and nearly derailed the reconciliation process. The Senate canceled a scheduled vote on the package in late May and left town as outrage grew within the GOP ranks.
Still, a Democratic attempt to add an amendment to the package — as part of a marathon process known as a vote-a-rama that accompanies reconciliation — on Thursday that would bar Trump from creating the fund fell short. Just three Republican senators joined their Democratic colleagues in their attempt to block the fund.
“Now the whole country can see the truth: Republicans fought like hell to protect Donald Trump and his slush fund but didn’t lift a finger to help working Americans lower their costs,” Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said in a statement Friday.
Trump also faced pushback on a proposal to include taxpayer funds for security upgrades related to his proposed White House ballroom. Senate parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough, who serves in a nonpartisan role advising on Senate procedure, had ruled in May that a $1 billion Secret Service provision for the project could not be included in the package.
Trump at the time demanded her firing in a TruthSocial post. On Monday, Trump again singled-out the MacDonough in a social media post.
“Senate Majority Leader John Thune should immediately fire the Parliamentarian, who treats Republicans, and everything that they stand for, horribly! She was put there by then Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, and Barack Hussein Obama, need I say more?” Trump wrote on TruthSocial.
“She is known as a Radical Left Lunatic that caters to Democrats, and has no respect for Republicans, or Republican Ideology. Just the other night, as an example, she ruled against us on a proposal that would have easily been approved, and should have been, by anyone else. We have every right to change her, and should do so, IMMEDIATELY,” the president continued.
